Showing 200 of total 1360 results (show query)

ikosmidis

brglm2:Bias Reduction in Generalized Linear Models

Estimation and inference from generalized linear models based on various methods for bias reduction and maximum penalized likelihood with powers of the Jeffreys prior as penalty. The 'brglmFit' fitting method can achieve reduction of estimation bias by solving either the mean bias-reducing adjusted score equations in Firth (1993) <doi:10.1093/biomet/80.1.27> and Kosmidis and Firth (2009) <doi:10.1093/biomet/asp055>, or the median bias-reduction adjusted score equations in Kenne et al. (2017) <doi:10.1093/biomet/asx046>, or through the direct subtraction of an estimate of the bias of the maximum likelihood estimator from the maximum likelihood estimates as in Cordeiro and McCullagh (1991) <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2345592>. See Kosmidis et al (2020) <doi:10.1007/s11222-019-09860-6> for more details. Estimation in all cases takes place via a quasi Fisher scoring algorithm, and S3 methods for the construction of of confidence intervals for the reduced-bias estimates are provided. In the special case of generalized linear models for binomial and multinomial responses (both ordinal and nominal), the adjusted score approaches to mean and media bias reduction have been found to return estimates with improved frequentist properties, that are also always finite, even in cases where the maximum likelihood estimates are infinite (e.g. complete and quasi-complete separation; see Kosmidis and Firth, 2020 <doi:10.1093/biomet/asaa052>, for a proof for mean bias reduction in logistic regression).

Maintained by Ioannis Kosmidis. Last updated 6 months ago.

adjusted-score-equationsalgorithmsbias-reducing-adjustmentsbias-reductionestimationglmlogistic-regressionnominal-responsesordinal-responsesregressionregression-algorithmsstatistics

21.6 match 32 stars 10.41 score 106 scripts 10 dependents

bioc

gcrma:Background Adjustment Using Sequence Information

Background adjustment using sequence information

Maintained by Z. Wu. Last updated 5 months ago.

microarrayonechannelpreprocessing

22.7 match 7.28 score 164 scripts 11 dependents

paulnorthrop

lax:Loglikelihood Adjustment for Extreme Value Models

Performs adjusted inferences based on model objects fitted, using maximum likelihood estimation, by the extreme value analysis packages 'eva' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=eva>, 'evd' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=evd>, 'evir' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=evir>, 'extRemes' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=extRemes>, 'fExtremes' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=fExtremes>, 'ismev' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=ismev>, 'mev' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=mev>, 'POT' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=POT> and 'texmex' <https://cran.r-project.org/package=texmex>. Adjusted standard errors and an adjusted loglikelihood are provided, using the 'chandwich' package <https://cran.r-project.org/package=chandwich> and the object-oriented features of the 'sandwich' package <https://cran.r-project.org/package=sandwich>. The adjustment is based on a robust sandwich estimator of the parameter covariance matrix, based on the methodology in Chandler and Bate (2007) <doi:10.1093/biomet/asm015>. This can be used for cluster correlated data when interest lies in the parameters of the marginal distributions, or for performing inferences that are robust to certain types of model misspecification. Univariate extreme value models, including regression models, are supported.

Maintained by Paul J. Northrop. Last updated 1 years ago.

clustered-dataclusterscomposite-likelihoodevdextreme-value-analysisextreme-value-statisticsextremesindependence-loglikelihoodloglikelihood-adjustmentmlepotregressionregression-modellingrobustsandwichsandwich-estimator

32.0 match 3 stars 4.29 score 13 scripts

pik-piam

mrtransport:Input data generation for the EDGE-Transport model

The mrtransport package contains data preprocessing for the EDGE-Transport model.

Maintained by Johanna Hoppe. Last updated 7 days ago.

17.5 match 4.84 score 3 dependents

kaifenglu

lrstat:Power and Sample Size Calculation for Non-Proportional Hazards and Beyond

Performs power and sample size calculation for non-proportional hazards model using the Fleming-Harrington family of weighted log-rank tests. The sequentially calculated log-rank test score statistics are assumed to have independent increments as characterized in Anastasios A. Tsiatis (1982) <doi:10.1080/01621459.1982.10477898>. The mean and variance of log-rank test score statistics are calculated based on Kaifeng Lu (2021) <doi:10.1002/pst.2069>. The boundary crossing probabilities are calculated using the recursive integration algorithm described in Christopher Jennison and Bruce W. Turnbull (2000, ISBN:0849303168). The package can also be used for continuous, binary, and count data. For continuous data, it can handle missing data through mixed-model for repeated measures (MMRM). In crossover designs, it can estimate direct treatment effects while accounting for carryover effects. For binary data, it can design Simon's 2-stage, modified toxicity probability-2 (mTPI-2), and Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) trials. For count data, it can design group sequential trials for negative binomial endpoints with censoring. Additionally, it facilitates group sequential equivalence trials for all supported data types. Moreover, it can design adaptive group sequential trials for changes in sample size, error spending function, number and spacing or future looks. Finally, it offers various options for adjusted p-values, including graphical and gatekeeping procedures.

Maintained by Kaifeng Lu. Last updated 3 months ago.

cpp

15.1 match 2 stars 5.58 score 30 scripts

romanhornung

bapred:Batch Effect Removal and Addon Normalization (in Phenotype Prediction using Gene Data)

Various tools dealing with batch effects, in particular enabling the removal of discrepancies between training and test sets in prediction scenarios. Moreover, addon quantile normalization and addon RMA normalization (Kostka & Spang, 2008) is implemented to enable integrating the quantile normalization step into prediction rules. The following batch effect removal methods are implemented: FAbatch, ComBat, (f)SVA, mean-centering, standardization, Ratio-A and Ratio-G. For each of these we provide an additional function which enables a posteriori ('addon') batch effect removal in independent batches ('test data'). Here, the (already batch effect adjusted) training data is not altered. For evaluating the success of batch effect adjustment several metrics are provided. Moreover, the package implements a plot for the visualization of batch effects using principal component analysis. The main functions of the package for batch effect adjustment are ba() and baaddon() which enable batch effect removal and addon batch effect removal, respectively, with one of the seven methods mentioned above. Another important function here is bametric() which is a wrapper function for all implemented methods for evaluating the success of batch effect removal. For (addon) quantile normalization and (addon) RMA normalization the functions qunormtrain(), qunormaddon(), rmatrain() and rmaaddon() can be used.

Maintained by Roman Hornung. Last updated 3 years ago.

38.6 match 1.78 score 20 scripts

branchlab

metasnf:Meta Clustering with Similarity Network Fusion

Framework to facilitate patient subtyping with similarity network fusion and meta clustering. The similarity network fusion (SNF) algorithm was introduced by Wang et al. (2014) in <doi:10.1038/nmeth.2810>. SNF is a data integration approach that can transform high-dimensional and diverse data types into a single similarity network suitable for clustering with minimal loss of information from each initial data source. The meta clustering approach was introduced by Caruana et al. (2006) in <doi:10.1109/ICDM.2006.103>. Meta clustering involves generating a wide range of cluster solutions by adjusting clustering hyperparameters, then clustering the solutions themselves into a manageable number of qualitatively similar solutions, and finally characterizing representative solutions to find ones that are best for the user's specific context. This package provides a framework to easily transform multi-modal data into a wide range of similarity network fusion-derived cluster solutions as well as to visualize, characterize, and validate those solutions. Core package functionality includes easy customization of distance metrics, clustering algorithms, and SNF hyperparameters to generate diverse clustering solutions; calculation and plotting of associations between features, between patients, and between cluster solutions; and standard cluster validation approaches including resampled measures of cluster stability, standard metrics of cluster quality, and label propagation to evaluate generalizability in unseen data. Associated vignettes guide the user through using the package to identify patient subtypes while adhering to best practices for unsupervised learning.

Maintained by Prashanth S Velayudhan. Last updated 5 days ago.

bioinformaticsclusteringmetaclusteringsnf

6.8 match 8 stars 8.21 score 30 scripts

r-spatial

spdep:Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics

A collection of functions to create spatial weights matrix objects from polygon 'contiguities', from point patterns by distance and tessellations, for summarizing these objects, and for permitting their use in spatial data analysis, including regional aggregation by minimum spanning tree; a collection of tests for spatial 'autocorrelation', including global 'Morans I' and 'Gearys C' proposed by 'Cliff' and 'Ord' (1973, ISBN: 0850860369) and (1981, ISBN: 0850860814), 'Hubert/Mantel' general cross product statistic, Empirical Bayes estimates and 'Assunรงรฃo/Reis' (1999) <doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990830)18:16%3C2147::AID-SIM179%3E3.0.CO;2-I> Index, 'Getis/Ord' G ('Getis' and 'Ord' 1992) <doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x> and multicoloured join count statistics, 'APLE' ('Li 'et al.' ) <doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2007.00708.x>, local 'Moran's I', 'Gearys C' ('Anselin' 1995) <doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x> and 'Getis/Ord' G ('Ord' and 'Getis' 1995) <doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x>, 'saddlepoint' approximations ('Tiefelsdorf' 2002) <doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2002.tb01084.x> and exact tests for global and local 'Moran's I' ('Bivand et al.' 2009) <doi:10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.021> and 'LOSH' local indicators of spatial heteroscedasticity ('Ord' and 'Getis') <doi:10.1007/s00168-011-0492-y>. The implementation of most of these measures is described in 'Bivand' and 'Wong' (2018) <doi:10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x>, with further extensions in 'Bivand' (2022) <doi:10.1111/gean.12319>. 'Lagrange' multiplier tests for spatial dependence in linear models are provided ('Anselin et al'. 1996) <doi:10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6>, as are 'Rao' score tests for hypothesised spatial 'Durbin' models based on linear models ('Koley' and 'Bera' 2023) <doi:10.1080/17421772.2023.2256810>. A local indicators for categorical data (LICD) implementation based on 'Carrer et al.' (2021) <doi:10.1016/j.jas.2020.105306> and 'Bivand et al.' (2017) <doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2017.03.003> was added in 1.3-7. From 'spdep' and 'spatialreg' versions >= 1.2-1, the model fitting functions previously present in this package are defunct in 'spdep' and may be found in 'spatialreg'.

Maintained by Roger Bivand. Last updated 19 days ago.

spatial-autocorrelationspatial-dependencespatial-weights

3.4 match 131 stars 16.62 score 6.0k scripts 107 dependents

tim-tu

weibulltools:Statistical Methods for Life Data Analysis

Provides statistical methods and visualizations that are often used in reliability engineering. Comprises a compact and easily accessible set of methods and visualization tools that make the examination and adjustment as well as the analysis and interpretation of field data (and bench tests) as simple as possible. Non-parametric estimators like Median Ranks, Kaplan-Meier (Abernethy, 2006, <ISBN:978-0-9653062-3-2>), Johnson (Johnson, 1964, <ISBN:978-0444403223>), and Nelson-Aalen for failure probability estimation within samples that contain failures as well as censored data are included. The package supports methods like Maximum Likelihood and Rank Regression, (Genschel and Meeker, 2010, <DOI:10.1080/08982112.2010.503447>) for the estimation of multiple parametric lifetime distributions, as well as the computation of confidence intervals of quantiles and probabilities using the delta method related to Fisher's confidence intervals (Meeker and Escobar, 1998, <ISBN:9780471673279>) and the beta-binomial confidence bounds. If desired, mixture model analysis can be done with segmented regression and the EM algorithm. Besides the well-known Weibull analysis, the package also contains Monte Carlo methods for the correction and completion of imprecisely recorded or unknown lifetime characteristics. (Verband der Automobilindustrie e.V. (VDA), 2016, <ISSN:0943-9412>). Plots are created statically ('ggplot2') or interactively ('plotly') and can be customized with functions of the respective visualization package. The graphical technique of probability plotting as well as the addition of regression lines and confidence bounds to existing plots are supported.

Maintained by Tim-Gunnar Hensel. Last updated 2 years ago.

field-data-analysisinteractive-visualizationsplotlyreliability-analysisweibull-analysisweibulltoolsopenblascpp

8.9 match 13 stars 6.15 score 54 scripts

guido-s

netmeta:Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods

A comprehensive set of functions providing frequentist methods for network meta-analysis (Balduzzi et al., 2023) <doi:10.18637/jss.v106.i02> and supporting Schwarzer et al. (2015) <doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21416-0>, Chapter 8 "Network Meta-Analysis": - frequentist network meta-analysis following Rรผcker (2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1058>; - additive network meta-analysis for combinations of treatments (Rรผcker et al., 2020) <doi:10.1002/bimj.201800167>; - network meta-analysis of binary data using the Mantel-Haenszel or non-central hypergeometric distribution method (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>, or penalised logistic regression (Evrenoglou et al., 2022) <doi:10.1002/sim.9562>; - rankograms and ranking of treatments by the Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) (Salanti et al., 2013) <doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016>; - ranking of treatments using P-scores (frequentist analogue of SUCRAs without resampling) according to Rรผcker & Schwarzer (2015) <doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0060-8>; - split direct and indirect evidence to check consistency (Dias et al., 2010) <doi:10.1002/sim.3767>, (Efthimiou et al., 2019) <doi:10.1002/sim.8158>; - league table with network meta-analysis results; - 'comparison-adjusted' funnel plot (Chaimani & Salanti, 2012) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.57>; - net heat plot and design-based decomposition of Cochran's Q according to Krahn et al. (2013) <doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-35>; - measures characterizing the flow of evidence between two treatments by Kรถnig et al. (2013) <doi:10.1002/sim.6001>; - automated drawing of network graphs described in Rรผcker & Schwarzer (2016) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1143>; - partial order of treatment rankings ('poset') and Hasse diagram for 'poset' (Carlsen & Bruggemann, 2014) <doi:10.1002/cem.2569>; (Rรผcker & Schwarzer, 2017) <doi:10.1002/jrsm.1270>; - contribution matrix as described in Papakonstantinou et al. (2018) <doi:10.12688/f1000research.14770.3> and Davies et al. (2022) <doi:10.1002/sim.9346>; - subgroup network meta-analysis.

Maintained by Guido Schwarzer. Last updated 3 days ago.

meta-analysisnetwork-meta-analysisrstudio

4.3 match 33 stars 11.82 score 199 scripts 10 dependents

mpiktas

midasr:Mixed Data Sampling Regression

Methods and tools for mixed frequency time series data analysis. Allows estimation, model selection and forecasting for MIDAS regressions.

Maintained by Vaidotas Zemlys-Baleviฤius. Last updated 3 years ago.

8.3 match 77 stars 5.76 score 150 scripts

cran

ADLP:Accident and Development Period Adjusted Linear Pools for Actuarial Stochastic Reserving

Loss reserving generally focuses on identifying a single model that can generate superior predictive performance. However, different loss reserving models specialise in capturing different aspects of loss data. This is recognised in practice in the sense that results from different models are often considered, and sometimes combined. For instance, actuaries may take a weighted average of the prediction outcomes from various loss reserving models, often based on subjective assessments. This package allows for the use of a systematic framework to objectively combine (i.e. ensemble) multiple stochastic loss reserving models such that the strengths offered by different models can be utilised effectively. Our framework is developed in Avanzi et al. (2023). Firstly, our criteria model combination considers the full distributional properties of the ensemble and not just the central estimate - which is of particular importance in the reserving context. Secondly, our framework is that it is tailored for the features inherent to reserving data. These include, for instance, accident, development, calendar, and claim maturity effects. Crucially, the relative importance and scarcity of data across accident periods renders the problem distinct from the traditional ensemble techniques in statistical learning. Our framework is illustrated with a complex synthetic dataset. In the results, the optimised ensemble outperforms both (i) traditional model selection strategies, and (ii) an equally weighted ensemble. In particular, the improvement occurs not only with central estimates but also relevant quantiles, such as the 75th percentile of reserves (typically of interest to both insurers and regulators). Reference: Avanzi B, Li Y, Wong B, Xian A (2023) "Ensemble distributional forecasting for insurance loss reserving" <doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.08541>.

Maintained by Yanfeng Li. Last updated 11 months ago.

15.8 match 2.70 score

nepem-ufsc

metan:Multi Environment Trials Analysis

Performs stability analysis of multi-environment trial data using parametric and non-parametric methods. Parametric methods includes Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis by Gauch (2013) <doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0241>, Ecovalence by Wricke (1965), Genotype plus Genotype-Environment (GGE) biplot analysis by Yan & Kang (2003) <doi:10.1201/9781420040371>, geometric adaptability index by Mohammadi & Amri (2008) <doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9600-6>, joint regression analysis by Eberhart & Russel (1966) <doi:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x>, genotypic confidence index by Annicchiarico (1992), Murakami & Cruz's (2004) method, power law residuals (POLAR) statistics by Doring et al. (2015) <doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.08.005>, scale-adjusted coefficient of variation by Doring & Reckling (2018) <doi:10.1016/j.eja.2018.06.007>, stability variance by Shukla (1972) <doi:10.1038/hdy.1972.87>, weighted average of absolute scores by Olivoto et al. (2019a) <doi:10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220>, and multi-trait stability index by Olivoto et al. (2019b) <doi:10.2134/agronj2019.03.0221>. Non-parametric methods includes superiority index by Lin & Binns (1988) <doi:10.4141/cjps88-018>, nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability by Huehn (1990) <doi:10.1007/BF00024241>, TOP third statistic by Fox et al. (1990) <doi:10.1007/BF00040364>. Functions for computing biometrical analysis such as path analysis, canonical correlation, partial correlation, clustering analysis, and tools for inspecting, manipulating, summarizing and plotting typical multi-environment trial data are also provided.

Maintained by Tiago Olivoto. Last updated 10 days ago.

4.3 match 2 stars 9.48 score 1.3k scripts 2 dependents

cran

FuzzySTs:Fuzzy Statistical Tools

The main goal of this package is to present various fuzzy statistical tools. It intends to provide an implementation of the theoretical and empirical approaches presented in the book entitled "The signed distance measure in fuzzy statistical analysis. Some theoretical, empirical and programming advances" <doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76916-1>. For the theoretical approaches, see Berkachy R. and Donze L. (2019) <doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03368-2_1>. For the empirical approaches, see Berkachy R. and Donze L. (2016) <ISBN: 978-989-758-201-1>). Important (non-exhaustive) implementation highlights of this package are as follows: (1) a numerical procedure to estimate the fuzzy difference and the fuzzy square. (2) two numerical methods of fuzzification. (3) a function performing different possibilities of distances, including the signed distance and the generalized signed distance for instance with all its properties. (4) numerical estimations of fuzzy statistical measures such as the variance, the moment, etc. (5) two methods of estimation of the bootstrap distribution of the likelihood ratio in the fuzzy context. (6) an estimation of a fuzzy confidence interval by the likelihood ratio method. (7) testing fuzzy hypotheses and/or fuzzy data by fuzzy confidence intervals in the Kwakernaak - Kruse and Meyer sense. (8) a general method to estimate the fuzzy p-value with fuzzy hypotheses and/or fuzzy data. (9) a method of estimation of global and individual evaluations of linguistic questionnaires. (10) numerical estimations of multi-ways analysis of variance models in the fuzzy context. The unbalance in the considered designs are also foreseen.

Maintained by Redina Berkachy. Last updated 8 months ago.

10.9 match 3.40 score

beckerbenj

eatGADS:Data Management of Large Hierarchical Data

Import 'SPSS' data, handle and change 'SPSS' meta data, store and access large hierarchical data in 'SQLite' data bases.

Maintained by Benjamin Becker. Last updated 24 days ago.

4.9 match 1 stars 7.36 score 34 scripts 1 dependents

bristol-vaccine-centre

testerror:Uncertainty in Multiplex Panel Testing

Provides methods to support the estimation of epidemiological parameters based on the results of multiplex panel tests.

Maintained by Robert Challen. Last updated 12 months ago.

10.6 match 1 stars 3.40 score 4 scripts

cran

VAM:Variance-Adjusted Mahalanobis

Contains logic for cell-specific gene set scoring of single cell RNA sequencing data.

Maintained by H. Robert Frost. Last updated 1 years ago.

7.1 match 4.78 score 4 dependents

alanarnholt

BSDA:Basic Statistics and Data Analysis

Data sets for book "Basic Statistics and Data Analysis" by Larry J. Kitchens.

Maintained by Alan T. Arnholt. Last updated 2 years ago.

3.4 match 7 stars 9.11 score 1.3k scripts 6 dependents

devopifex

g2r:Interactive Grammar of Graphics

Interactive grammar of graphics.

Maintained by John Coene. Last updated 3 years ago.

visualization

6.6 match 119 stars 4.53 score 57 scripts

jomulder

BFpack:Flexible Bayes Factor Testing of Scientific Expectations

Implementation of default Bayes factors for testing statistical hypotheses under various statistical models. The package is intended for applied quantitative researchers in the social and behavioral sciences, medical research, and related fields. The Bayes factor tests can be executed for statistical models such as univariate and multivariate normal linear models, correlation analysis, generalized linear models, special cases of linear mixed models, survival models, relational event models. Parameters that can be tested are location parameters (e.g., group means, regression coefficients), variances (e.g., group variances), and measures of association (e.g,. polychoric/polyserial/biserial/tetrachoric/product moments correlations), among others. The statistical underpinnings are described in O'Hagan (1995) <DOI:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02017.x>, De Santis and Spezzaferri (2001) <DOI:10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00240-8>, Mulder and Xin (2022) <DOI:10.1080/00273171.2021.1904809>, Mulder and Gelissen (2019) <DOI:10.1080/02664763.2021.1992360>, Mulder (2016) <DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2014.09.004>, Mulder and Fox (2019) <DOI:10.1214/18-BA1115>, Mulder and Fox (2013) <DOI:10.1007/s11222-011-9295-3>, Boeing-Messing, van Assen, Hofman, Hoijtink, and Mulder (2017) <DOI:10.1037/met0000116>, Hoijtink, Mulder, van Lissa, and Gu (2018) <DOI:10.1037/met0000201>, Gu, Mulder, and Hoijtink (2018) <DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12110>, Hoijtink, Gu, and Mulder (2018) <DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12145>, and Hoijtink, Gu, Mulder, and Rosseel (2018) <DOI:10.1037/met0000187>. When using the packages, please refer to the package Mulder et al. (2021) <DOI:10.18637/jss.v100.i18> and the relevant methodological papers.

Maintained by Joris Mulder. Last updated 1 months ago.

fortranopenblas

3.6 match 15 stars 8.24 score 55 scripts 3 dependents

agqhammond

UKFE:UK Flood Estimation

Functions to implement the methods of the Flood Estimation Handbook (FEH), associated updates and the revitalised flood hydrograph model (ReFH). Currently the package uses NRFA peak flow dataset version 13. Aside from FEH functionality, further hydrological functions are available. Most of the methods implemented in this package are described in one or more of the following: "Flood Estimation Handbook", Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (1999, ISBN:0 948540 94 X). "Flood Estimation Handbook Supplementary Report No. 1", Kjeldsen (2007, ISBN:0 903741 15 7). "Regional Frequency Analysis - an approach based on L-moments", Hosking & Wallis (1997, ISBN: 978 0 521 01940 8). "Proposal of the extreme rank plot for extreme value analysis: with an emphasis on flood frequency studies", Hammond (2019, <doi:10.2166/nh.2019.157>). "Making better use of local data in flood frequency estimation", Environment Agency (2017, ISBN: 978 1 84911 387 8). "Sampling uncertainty of UK design flood estimation" , Hammond (2021, <doi:10.2166/nh.2021.059>). "Improving the FEH statistical procedures for flood frequency estimation", Environment Agency (2008, ISBN: 978 1 84432 920 5). "Low flow estimation in the United Kingdom", Institute of Hydrology (1992, ISBN 0 948540 45 1). Wallingford HydroSolutions, (2016, <http://software.hydrosolutions.co.uk/winfap4/Urban-Adjustment-Procedure-Technical-Note.pdf>). Data from the UK National River Flow Archive (<https://nrfa.ceh.ac.uk/>, terms and conditions: <https://nrfa.ceh.ac.uk/costs-terms-and-conditions>).

Maintained by Anthony Hammond. Last updated 1 months ago.

16.2 match 1 stars 1.78 score