Showing 102 of total 102 results (show query)

hubverse-org

hubVis:Plotting methods for hub models output

Plotting methods for hub models output.

Maintained by Lucie Contamin. Last updated 4 months ago.

hubverse

9.1 match 3 stars 4.44 score 22 scripts 1 dependents

alanarnholt

BSDA:Basic Statistics and Data Analysis

Data sets for book "Basic Statistics and Data Analysis" by Larry J. Kitchens.

Maintained by Alan T. Arnholt. Last updated 2 years ago.

3.4 match 7 stars 9.11 score 1.3k scripts 6 dependents

r-forge

distrEx:Extensions of Package 'distr'

Extends package 'distr' by functionals, distances, and conditional distributions.

Maintained by Matthias Kohl. Last updated 2 months ago.

3.5 match 6.68 score 107 scripts 17 dependents

r-forge

RobAStBase:Robust Asymptotic Statistics

Base S4-classes and functions for robust asymptotic statistics.

Maintained by Matthias Kohl. Last updated 2 months ago.

4.1 match 4.96 score 64 scripts 4 dependents

dpc10ster

RJafroc:Artificial Intelligence Systems and Observer Performance

Analyzing the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) systems/algorithms characterized by a 'search-and-report' strategy. Historically observer performance has dealt with measuring radiologists' performances in search tasks, e.g., searching for lesions in medical images and reporting them, but the implicit location information has been ignored. The implemented methods apply to analyzing the absolute and relative performances of AI systems, comparing AI performance to a group of human readers or optimizing the reporting threshold of an AI system. In addition to performing historical receiver operating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (localization information ignored), the software also performs free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis, where lesion localization information is used. A book using the software has been published: Chakraborty DP: Observer Performance Methods for Diagnostic Imaging - Foundations, Modeling, and Applications with R-Based Examples, Taylor-Francis LLC; 2017: <https://www.routledge.com/Observer-Performance-Methods-for-Diagnostic-Imaging-Foundations-Modeling/Chakraborty/p/book/9781482214840>. Online updates to this book, which use the software, are at <https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocQuickStart/>, <https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocRocBook/> and at <https://dpc10ster.github.io/RJafrocFrocBook/>. Supported data collection paradigms are the ROC, FROC and the location ROC (LROC). ROC data consists of single ratings per images, where a rating is the perceived confidence level that the image is that of a diseased patient. An ROC curve is a plot of true positive fraction vs. false positive fraction. FROC data consists of a variable number (zero or more) of mark-rating pairs per image, where a mark is the location of a reported suspicious region and the rating is the confidence level that it is a real lesion. LROC data consists of a rating and a location of the most suspicious region, for every image. Four models of observer performance, and curve-fitting software, are implemented: the binormal model (BM), the contaminated binormal model (CBM), the correlated contaminated binormal model (CORCBM), and the radiological search model (RSM). Unlike the binormal model, CBM, CORCBM and RSM predict 'proper' ROC curves that do not inappropriately cross the chance diagonal. Additionally, RSM parameters are related to search performance (not measured in conventional ROC analysis) and classification performance. Search performance refers to finding lesions, i.e., true positives, while simultaneously not finding false positive locations. Classification performance measures the ability to distinguish between true and false positive locations. Knowing these separate performances allows principled optimization of reader or AI system performance. This package supersedes Windows JAFROC (jackknife alternative FROC) software V4.2.1, <https://github.com/dpc10ster/WindowsJafroc>. Package functions are organized as follows. Data file related function names are preceded by 'Df', curve fitting functions by 'Fit', included data sets by 'dataset', plotting functions by 'Plot', significance testing functions by 'St', sample size related functions by 'Ss', data simulation functions by 'Simulate' and utility functions by 'Util'. Implemented are figures of merit (FOMs) for quantifying performance and functions for visualizing empirical or fitted operating characteristics: e.g., ROC, FROC, alternative FROC (AFROC) and weighted AFROC (wAFROC) curves. For fully crossed study designs significance testing of reader-averaged FOM differences between modalities is implemented via either Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz or the Obuchowski-Rockette methods. Also implemented is single modality analysis, which allows comparison of performance of a group of radiologists to a specified value, or comparison of AI to a group of radiologists interpreting the same cases. Crossed-modality analysis is implemented wherein there are two crossed modality factors and the aim is to determined performance in each modality factor averaged over all levels of the second factor. Sample size estimation tools are provided for ROC and FROC studies; these use estimates of the relevant variances from a pilot study to predict required numbers of readers and cases in a pivotal study to achieve the desired power. Utility and data file manipulation functions allow data to be read in any of the currently used input formats, including Excel, and the results of the analysis can be viewed in text or Excel output files. The methods are illustrated with several included datasets from the author's collaborations. This update includes improvements to the code, some as a result of user-reported bugs and new feature requests, and others discovered during ongoing testing and code simplification.

Maintained by Dev Chakraborty. Last updated 5 months ago.

ai-optimizationartificial-intelligence-algorithmscomputer-aided-diagnosisfroc-analysisroc-analysistarget-classificationtarget-localizationcpp

2.4 match 19 stars 5.69 score 65 scripts

hubverse-org

hubExamples:Example Hub Data

This package provides example data for forecasting and scenario modeling hubs in the hubverse format.

Maintained by Evan L Ray. Last updated 2 months ago.

1.6 match 1 stars 5.46 score 20 scripts 1 dependents

aschersleben

cointReg:Parameter Estimation and Inference in a Cointegrating Regression

Cointegration methods are widely used in empirical macroeconomics and empirical finance. It is well known that in a cointegrating regression the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator of the parameters is super-consistent, i.e. converges at rate equal to the sample size T. When the regressors are endogenous, the limiting distribution of the OLS estimator is contaminated by so-called second order bias terms, see e.g. Phillips and Hansen (1990) <DOI:10.2307/2297545>. The presence of these bias terms renders inference difficult. Consequently, several modifications to OLS that lead to zero mean Gaussian mixture limiting distributions have been proposed, which in turn make standard asymptotic inference feasible. These methods include the fully modified OLS (FM-OLS) approach of Phillips and Hansen (1990) <DOI:10.2307/2297545>, the dynamic OLS (D-OLS) approach of Phillips and Loretan (1991) <DOI:10.2307/2298004>, Saikkonen (1991) <DOI:10.1017/S0266466600004217> and Stock and Watson (1993) <DOI:10.2307/2951763> and the new estimation approach called integrated modified OLS (IM-OLS) of Vogelsang and Wagner (2014) <DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.10.015>. The latter is based on an augmented partial sum (integration) transformation of the regression model. IM-OLS is similar in spirit to the FM- and D-OLS approaches, with the key difference that it does not require estimation of long run variance matrices and avoids the need to choose tuning parameters (kernels, bandwidths, lags). However, inference does require that a long run variance be scaled out. This package provides functions for the parameter estimation and inference with all three modified OLS approaches. That includes the automatic bandwidth selection approaches of Andrews (1991) <DOI:10.2307/2938229> and of Newey and West (1994) <DOI:10.2307/2297912> as well as the calculation of the long run variance.

Maintained by Philipp Aschersleben. Last updated 8 years ago.

0.5 match 5 stars 5.27 score 25 scripts 1 dependents

cran

SeleMix:Selective Editing via Mixture Models

Detection of outliers and influential errors using a latent variable model.

Maintained by Teresa Buglielli. Last updated 2 months ago.

2.0 match 1.04 score 11 scripts